A Columbia University statistical analysis of NYPD stop-and-frisk data found that when comparing stops to DCJS arrests, Blacks were stopped 23% more often than Whites and Hispanics were stopped 39% more often than Whites [2]. The ratio of stops to arrests was …
📍New York, NY, NY
👤Education & schoolsJim CrowLatino
Read more about this entry
A Columbia University statistical analysis of NYPD stop-and-frisk data found that when comparing stops to DCJS arrests, Blacks were stopped 23% more often than Whites and Hispanics were stopped 39% more often than Whites [2]. The ratio of stops to arrests was 1.24 for Whites, 1.54 for Blacks, and 1.72 for Hispanics, indicating disproportionate enforcement against minority communities [2]. This analysis controlled for relevant factors related to pedestrian and stop characteristics, highlighting the significance of implicit bias in these encounters [2][6].
The New York City Police Department released 2006 stop-and-frisk data showing that Black and Latino residents comprised more than 80% of all individuals searched [1]. The data revealed that while Blacks and Latinos made up 52% and 31% of the population respectively, …
📍New York, NY, NY
👤African AmericanJim CrowLatinoPolicing
Read more about this entry
The New York City Police Department released 2006 stop-and-frisk data showing that Black and Latino residents comprised more than 80% of all individuals searched [1]. The data revealed that while Blacks and Latinos made up 52% and 31% of the population respectively, they accounted for 90% of all stops from 2003–2024, with Blacks representing 53% of stops despite being only 23% of the population [1][5]. Raw statistics indicated that 89% of stops involved nonwhite suspects, with 53% involving Black suspects and 29% involving Hispanic suspects [7].